We Are Way Behind

We are losing a war that most if us don’t even know we are fighting. That was the sobering message delivered by CNN Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Jim Sciutto at the Cleveland City Club yesterday.

For three decades, China and Russia have been conducting carefully calibrated, disciplined, and effective campaigns to reduce America’s global power and influence, said Sciutto. Their tools have included cyber-attacks, theft of intellectual property, espionage, territorial acquisition, murders of dissidents, weapons in space, improvements in submarine technology, and increasingly aggressive military actions.

None of these efforts have been secret, said Sciutto. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, Chinese construction of military facilities on disputed islands in the South China Sea, Russian attempts to murder dissidents in London, Chinese theft of intellectual property, Russian interference in American elections and many other efforts are all well-known.

But the U.S. has responded to each incident as individual events, when, if fact, they were all elements of concerted and coordinated campaigns.

“We have failed to connect the dots,” said Sciutto. As a result, our responses have been ineffective. “We need to look at the full spectrum of Chinese and Russian actions.”

CNN Chief Foreign Correspondent Jim Sciutto at the Cleveland City Club

China and Russia are not conducting a joint campaign, said Sciutto. Their relationship is still marred by distrust, vast cultural and historic differences, and a long history of enmity. But they share an interest in rolling back U.S. power and influence, and they have adopted similar strategies. “If they see a convergence of interests,” he said, “they will cooperate.”

Both nations are pleased to see the United States retreat from global commitments, promises, and agreements. America’s withdrawal from Syria allowed Russia to increase its influence in the region and also gain access to a warm-water port on the Mediterranean Sea. America’s reluctance to confront China in the South China Sea has greatly strengthened China’s position there.

China and Russia have been careful to keep their actions below the threshold that would prompt an American military response, Sciutto said. The actions we have taken – warnings, sanctions, and military deployments – have not worked.

The United States has had ample evidence for years that Russia and China have been conducting deliberate campaigns aimed at reducing US power and influence, said Sciutto. But administrations from both parties, “have either ignored it or believed that their behavior will change over time.”

We have overlooked the significant differences between the United States and China and Russian, thinking they were more like us than they actually are, said Sciutto. In reality, their cultures, histories, economies, and politics are vastly different than ours. But we persisted in imagining that Russia and China want what we want, or that they will evolve to become more like us.

Not only has the U.S. response been ineffective, said Sciutto, but American leaders have not spoken out about Chinese and Russian attacks in a way that the American people can understand.

Today, U.S. government and military organizations recognize the growing threat from China and Russia and are taking positive steps, said Sciutto. But our failure to recognize the danger earlier has given both nations a head start. “We are way behind.”

Sciutto is not advocating a military response to Chinese and Russian non-military actions. But he believes that the United States must develop a coordinated, whole-of-government response that is based on a well-thought and considered strategy.

But even as American military and intelligence leaders are beginning to address the situation, the highest levels of the Trump administration continue to disbelieve or deny the threat, said Sciutto.

“We make it a heck of a lot easier for Russia and China by battling among ourselves, even in the face of incontrovertible evidence because some people see political advantage in denying Russia and China’s actions,” said Sciutto. “They do Russia’s work for them.”

Officials in U.S. military and intelligence agencies crave effective leadership from the top, said Sciutto. “They are not seeing it, and it is something we need to succeed.”

For a more detailed discussion, see Jim Sciutto’s book The Shadow War: Inside Russia’s and China’s Secret Operations to Defeat America; HarperCollins; New York; 2019.

top image: Chinese and Russian warships in formation in 2016. (Photo: Xinhua)

June 11, 2019

A Rumor of Spring

February in Ohio

February 23,2019

Spring has already arrived in London, where our daughter is attending university. This is in contrast to the situation here in Northeast Ohio, where we have another month or two of wintry weather ahead of us.

London’s mild climate is a little surprising since the city is pretty far north. If London were to be dragged westward to North America, it would be located in the upper reaches of Hudson Bay. The European city that is at the same latitude as Cleveland is not Oslo or Stockholm, which you might assume as you slog through another endless winter, but is Rome, whose Mediterranean climate is far milder than ours.

February in London (photo by Melina Topp)

The difference, of course, is the warming effect of the North Atlantic current, which significantly moderates Europe’s climate.

We may get our revenge, though, when warming sea temperatures and the melting icecap in Greenland disrupt the North Atlantic currents, turning off Europe’s supply of warmer water and lowering the winter temperature of the continent significantly.

It’s Always Something…

Martens are small, weasel-like mammals that are common in Europe.  Too common, for some car owners.

For reasons that are not exactly clear, it seems that martens enjoy eating the rubber insulation from automobile engines in Germany.  That’s tough.  Here we don’t have to worry too much about forest creatures eating our cars.  Of course, in Germany they don’t have to worry about the guy standing next to them at McDonalds pulling out a pistol and shooting the place up because his fries are cold.

Don’t take my word for it. Check it out.

http://www.living-in-germany.net/your-car-vs-the-marten/

Marten image: Tony Braithwaite, BBC

February 10, 2019

“An incredible place to be”

Just returned from a week in London, where our daughter will be attending university.

While the uncertainty over Brexit is causing some consternation in the UK, life in the Kingston-Upon-Thames section of London remains outwardly unaffected.

This was my second trip to London, and it was completely fascinating and enjoyable.

Five things I especially like about London:

  1. The design of the city is efficient and compact. Little or no space is wasted on huge, useless lawns and surface parking lots and population density is high, meaning offices, shops, cafes, and restaurants are almost always within walking distance. More people in less area means more opportunities for interaction, cooperation, economic activity, and creative collaboration – the building blocks of successful communities. The roads are not laid out in a grid, and they are not normally straight, so I am sure that driving is confusing, especially since the streets were not designed for cars and are narrow and often congested.  But, as a tourist at least, there is no reason to drive a car in the city, as there is no place that you might want to go that you cannot easily reach on foot or by bus or train.
  1. Walking, biking, strolling, riding trains and riding buses are nearly always more convenient and enjoyable than similar activities in the USA. The non-auto transportation infrastructure is well-developed, well-designed, and well-maintained. The city was more than a thousand years old before cars were even invented, so you see virtually none of the auto-centric development that has defaced so much of America.
  1. The city is more crowded and diverse than I expected. Of the two, the crowds were more surprising.  Shopping districts, museums, and parks all seem to be well-attended.  At times, they are uncomfortably crowded.  Not exactly sure why I didn’t expect the city to be crowded, as it was the most populous city on earth from 1831 until 1925.  Today, it has more international arrivals each year than any other city. As for diversity, well, London was the center of a world-wide empire for hundreds of years, so it has always drawn migrants, immigrants, visitors, merchants, financiers, and government officials from all over the planet.  While the empire is no more, London has remained one of the most accessible and open of the world’s great cities.
  1. History is everywhere.  The first settlement on the site was built by the Romans around 2,000 years ago.  Ruins from the Roman era still can be seen. By 1300, London was a city of more than 100,000 inhabitants. Shakespeare’s theater, the Tower of London, the British Museum, Churchill’s war room and countless other sites remind us daily that we are links in an endless chain, and that we might be wise to consider the effect of our actions – or inactions – on future generations. Standing on a bridge that is 900 years old provides a perspective that is not easily available in the United States.
  1. The Royal Parks. Most cities have parks – but no place has a collection of enormous, accessible, well-maintained, and well-used parks like London.  Hyde Park, Richmond Park, Green Park, Kensington Gardens and the other Royal Parks cover almost 5,000 acres of land in Greater London.

“Aesthetically speaking, London is just beautiful; it’s a gorgeous city. The architecture, the monuments, the parks, the small streets – it’s an incredible place to be.”  – Sara Bareilles

 “The vibe of London as a city is captivating. It’s both fast-paced and extremely rushed but still has the calmness that would attract any big-city person.” – Ali Fazal

Quotes from: https://www.brainyquote.com/topics/london

September 20, 2018

Managing China’s Return

As Chinese economic, diplomatic, and military power grows, and China becomes ever more assertive in pursuing its interests in Asia, the United States must inevitably adjust to the changing strategic landscape in the Indo-Pacific region.

The ability of China and the United States to jointly manage the evolution of the strategic landscape will determine if war or peace prevail. But our ability to manage conflict is limited by our incomplete understanding of Chinese history, culture, political philosophy, and national power.

Here are seven things to keep in mind when trying to assess the threat that China might pose to the United States:

  1. For most of its history, China was the most technologically advanced and modern society on the planet, a status that the nation achieved and maintained without engaging in campaigns of military conquest. China’s ability to amass and maintain a vast empire without military conquest is a significant source of pride for the Chinese people and is an integral component of China’s national mythology – whether completely accurate or not. (1)
  2. China does not consider itself a ‘rising power;’ it believes that it is a ‘returning power,‘ reclaiming the respect and influence it enjoyed in Asia for two thousand years. Lee Kuan Yew, longtime president of Singapore and a careful observer of China, stated that China’s number one priority is to “recover its lost greatness.” (2).
  3. As a land-based power surrounded by powerful states, with more than 13,000 miles of indefensible borders, China’s greatest strategic fear has been and remains that of being encircled by powerful enemies. Today, China is surrounded by potential adversaries: Russia to the north, Japan and South Korea to the east, Vietnam and India to the south, and Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines nearby. In Henry Kissinger’s description, “This is not a constellation conducive to conquest. It is more likely to raise fears of encirclement.” (3)
  4. A second strategic priority for China is resisting foreign efforts to foment internal discontent.
  5. A third strategic imperative is the desire to reclaim China’s historical sphere of influence, including the nearshore waters of the Taiwan Strait, the East China Sea, and the South China Sea. This concern has drawn China into armed confrontations with states that have competing claims in the South China Sea and the East China Sea and with the United States (1954, 1958, 1995-1996). China’s claimed historical right to islands in the South China Sea is one of the primary sources of tension in the region today.
  6. Historically, China has preferred to use war as part of a comprehensive political effort to shape the strategic environment that includes diplomacy, economics, and other elements of national power. They do not distinguish between war and diplomacy. They use war as a means of gaining an advantage in future relations, rather than as a means to resolve issues. They are extremely wary of prolonged wars of attrition, and prefer to strike quick, sharp blows for maximum psychological effect and then withdraw militarily, even if their operational and tactical objectives have not been achieved. They are not afraid of stalemates and they are adept at keeping conflicts simmering at a low level to psychologically exhaust their opponents. (4)
  7. China’s rich and extensive history is the foundation of Chinese national security policies. Historically, China’s military has been used almost exclusively to secure the nation’s borders, repel invaders, maintain internal order, and protect the ruling government.

Notes:

(1) – Kissinger, Henry; The Future of U.S. – China Relations; Foreign Affairs Magazine; March/April 2012;  https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2012-03-01/future-us-chinese-relations, Retrieved 8.15.2018.

(2)- Allison, Graham; Destined for War; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; Boston – New York; 2017; page 107.

(3)  – Kissinger, (March/April 2012)

(4) – Li, Xiaobing, editor; China at War: An Encyclopedia; ABC-CLIO; Santa Barbara, CA; 2012; page xvii.

 

August 29, 2018

Killing Syrians

Let me get this straight: President Assad should be removed from office because he is killing so many Syrians. To punish him for killing Syrians, we propose to conduct missile/air strikes to kill Syrians. But to avoid killing Syrians (and Russians), we’ve given them about a week’s notice.

So, I wonder, what is the magic number of Syrians we need to kill to stop Assad from killing Syrians?

But killing Syrians is OK, as long as you (or we) use conventional munitions.  It is only not OK if you use chemical weapons.

Well, that clears it up.

Certainly, there is no good answer concerning chemical weapons, and it would be very helpful if there were some effective way to punish the people responsible for ordering and executing chemical attacks.  I just wish that we had options other than one-time air strikes, which don’t exactly have an unblemished record of success.

I am hard pressed to think of a single instance in which a single air strike (or a limited air campaign) actually accomplished some useful political or military goal.  Even if they are launched ostensibly as punishment for a specific act, isn’t their goal to influence future behavior?  Or are we just killing people because we can?  When did limited strikes actually change a regime’s behavior? Lebanon in 1983? Libya in 1986 (El Dorado Canyon)?  Iraq in 1996 (Desert Strike), 1998 (Desert Fox) and countless minor strikes in support of the no-fly zones from 1991-2003? Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998?  Kosovo in 1999? Syria in 2017?

Did Libya stop sponsoring terrorism?  Did Saddam Hussein calm down?  Did al-Qaeda give up their goal of attacking the United States? Did Syria stop using chemical weapons? Someone could argue that the air campaign in Kosovo succeeded in altering Serbia’s behavior, but it took 78 days, the loss of Russian support, and an increasingly credible threat of a ground invasion.

Military attacks are a pretty blunt tool, the exact consequences are unknowable, but frequently turn out to be counterproductive. Although I have no access to the information they have in the White House, I seriously doubt that there is some so-far undisclosed number of Syrians that we can kill that will force Assad to stop killing Syrians.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/11/politics/trump-missiles-tweet/index.html

April 11, 2018

Notes from London

London Skyline WITH Modern office towers

Just returned from a week-long visit to London. Here are six quick impressions:

  1. The public transit system is efficient and effective. The region-wide system includes a combination of subways, surface trains, buses, taxis, and passenger ferries and it reaches all sectors of the metropolitan area. We used surface trains and subways on this trip and we found the trains and stations to be clean, well-lighted, well maintained, and easy to use. We purchased re-fillable fare cards, called Oyster Cards, before we left home and the cards were convenient and easy to “top-up” with additional money at fare machines located at every station. Signage throughout the rail systems was abundant and easy to understand.
  2. The population of London is diverse and cosmopolitan, and Londoners take pride in the way all ethnic, religious, and racial groups get along. As our visit was limited to central London and some western boroughs, we cannot say that there aren’t problems in some areas, but we never got a sense that there were significant ethnic, religious, or racial issues. I would guess that the tolerant atmosphere is at least partially a result of the city’s long history as the center of a world-wide empire.
  3. The city is more crowded than we expected. Streets and sidewalks were frequently jammed with pedestrians and there was never a time when there weren’t other people around.
  4. Green Park

    New construction and renovations are occurring all over the city. A few buildings here and there are in poor repair, but with the population rising and property values soaring, we do not recall seeing any vacant buildings or lots.

  5. The large city parks – St. James Park, Hyde Park, Richmond Park, Bushy Park, Green Park, etc. – are enormous. Many were originally established as private hunting preserves for the royal family, but today they are open to all, are well-maintained, and are very popular.  As a center of history and culture, few urban centers can rival London, so spending a day or two in the parks might seem like an opportunity wasted; we have trees at home, after all.  But the parks are quintessentially British, and they are historic in their own right, so I would encourage visitors to spend some time there.
  6. As is so often the case while traveling internationally, plenty of folks we encountered spoke English, so our traditional American unfamiliarity with the local language and customs was no problem at all.

November 18, 2017