That Can’t Be Legal

It was a New Deal program that promoted old-fashioned housing discrimination and caused lasting damage to individuals and urban neighborhoods.

The 1934 National Housing Act revived the nation’s struggling construction industry and provided improved housing for tens of millions of Americans. Later, the Act – and the thirty-year mortgages it spawned – set the stage for America’s post-war housing boom. But the Act also encouraged redlining, a then-legal yet highly-discriminatory practice that denied mortgages to residents of thousands of urban neighborhoods. The results were predictably catastrophic. Today, fifty years after redlining was made illegal, its victims, their descendants, and the communities where they lived still suffer from its effects.

Redlining was the denial of financial services – including mortgages and insurance policies – to residents of targeted districts. Without access to federally guaranteed loans, residents of redlined neighborhoods were trapped in declining areas where jobs were scarce and industrial pollution was rampant. The practice denied them the opportunity to build equity and wealth, a generational penalty that is still being paid.

Redlining wasn’t specifically intended to destroy neighborhoods, though it was instrumental in the destruction of many. Its purpose was to protect mortgage issuers and the federal government from the risk of non-repayment.  But rather than require lenders to carefully assess the financial status of each loan applicant, the government allowed financial institutions to deny loans collectively to all residents of designated districts. Worse, the federal government actually laid the groundwork for redlining by developing the maps that labeled some neighborhoods as safe for loans, and others as highly risky.

Federal ‘residential security maps’ were created for more than 200 American cities by the Home Owner’s Loan Corporation (HOLC). These maps assigned each of a city’s neighborhoods one of four ratings: Type A – typically affluent neighborhoods on the edges of the urban area; Type B – less affluent, but still desirable neighborhoods; Type C – declining neighborhoods; and Type D –  lower income neighborhoods, hazardous for lenders. On the maps prepared by HOLC, Type D areas were outlined in red – thus, redlining.

Map of the Cleveland Metropolitan District and Cuyahoga County, created by the Home Owner’s Loan Corporation (HOLC) in 1940

Ratings were assigned based on demographics and other characteristics. Banks were eager to make loans in Type A and B neighborhoods. Some loans were made in Type C neighborhoods, but the terms were harsher than loans in better neighborhoods. Virtually no loans were made in Type D areas.

Neighborhoods with measurable numbers of African-American, Jewish, Asian, and Hispanic residents were nearly always assigned Type D. Not only were residents of these areas denied loans, but the rating itself lowered neighborhood property values. The fact that African-American residents caused a neighborhood to be redlined gave whites yet another reason to keep African-Americans out of their communities through zoning regulations, restrictive housing covenants, and, at times, threats of violence.

Redlining didn’t create racially segregated cities. By the mid-1930’s, African-Americans were already confined to inner city ghettos by prejudice and fear. But redlining gave housing discrimination a veneer of legality, if not moral authority, and it provided banks with a justification for discriminatory practices that effectively trapped African-Americans in overcrowded, decaying slums where they were easily exploited by landlords who charged excessive rents and made few repairs.

Redlining also denied African-Americans the benefits of federal housing policy from the 1930’s to the 1970’s, a period when the nation’s rate of home ownership jumped from under 50 percent to almost 70 percent. By the late 1950’s, fewer than two percent of FHA-guaranteed loans had been issued to minorities.

The Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 ended legal redlining. But the effects of the practice are still felt, said Devonta’ Dickey, Advocacy and Engagement Coordinator for Cleveland Neighborhood Progress. Redlining and other forms of housing discrimination are significant factors in the disparity in wealth between whites and the victims of redlining.

In Cleveland, areas redlined on the HOLC’s 1940 map correspond almost exactly with areas that today suffer the highest rates of poverty, poor health, disinvestment, foreclosures, and toxic releases, Dickey said.

Discriminatory practices in Cuyahoga County didn’t end when redlining was made illegal. Research conducted in 2019 by the Western Reserve Land Conservancy’s Thriving Communities Program found that African American borrowers seeking home purchase loans are denied more than twice as often as Caucasian borrowers. Further, high income blacks are denied loans more often than moderate- and middle-income Caucasians.

February 28, 2020

References:

https://livingnewdeal.org/glossary/national-housing-act-1934/

https://livingnewdeal.org/glossary/national-housing-act-1934/

https://www.wrlandconservancy.org/articles/2019/07/31/housingmarketstudy/

Images:

Top image: House from redlined neighborhood in Cleveland, 1962; Cleveland Public Library

HOLC map: https://ohiohome.org/news/blog/october-2018/predictingevictions.aspx

Take This Bag and Shove It

Plastic pollution is a growing environmental problem which kills countless animals every year and may be threatening human health. But the problems with plastic pollution are self-inflicted, and can be mitigated if we decide to do so.

That was the message presented by Ohio State University’s Sea Grant program educator Jill Bartolotta, Wednesday, at Cuyahoga Community College’s Westshore campus.

Bartolotta’s wide-ranging talk covered the ways that plastic enters the environment, the harm it causes, the failure of plastic recycling, Cuyahoga County’s plastic bag ban, and other efforts to reduce the amount of plastic pollution.

“Plastic is awesome when it is used for its intended purpose,” said Bartolotta.  As a material plastic is inexpensive, lightweight, and durable, with many important uses, including medical applications and food preservation. But plastic has a critical characteristic that makes it problematic for animal health, human health, and the environment in general.

“Plastic does not break down into anything useful,” she said. “Plastic was never intended to be in the natural environment.”

96 percent of litter collected in Great Lakes beach clean-ups is plastic.

Discarded plastic that remains in the environment breaks apart under the effects of sunlight, wind, and rain into smaller and smaller fragments. But it never becomes anything other than plastic. And the smaller it gets, the more pathways it has to enter our drinking water and food.

Plastic that has not yet broken down has catastrophic impacts on the environment. Plastic bags and plastic film are swallowed by animals that mistake them for food. Plastic lines, netting, and balloons entrap animals, frequently killing them. And plastic litter fouls land and water across the planet.

Ninety-six percent of debris collected in beach clean-ups around the Great Lakes is plastic, said Bartolota.

But the greatest harm from plastic occurs when it is reduced to microplastic shards, pellets, or fibers. These particles are ingested by animals and people and while the impact on human health is still unclear, studies on animals have found that microplastics disrupt their hormone systems, nervous systems, and digestive systems. In animals, feeding, reproduction, growth, and movement are all affected by microplastics in the environment.

Microplastics have been found in plankton, the very base of the food chain. Plankton is consumed by small organisms, and those organisms are consumed by larger organisms, and so on, moving plastic up the food chain. Today, microplastics are found in our drinking water – bottled and tap – and in our food.

“You are eating, drinking, and breathing plastic every day,” said Bartolotta.

A significant source of plastic in the environment is the shedding of plastic microfibers from synthetic fabrics like polyester, rayon, and nylon. A single washing of a fleece garment can release between 10,000 and 100,000 plastic microfibers, said Bartolotta. Another source is beauty products. Although plastic microbeads were prohibited in some beauty products in 2015, they are still added to products that were not covered by the law.

Microplastic in the environment is impossible to remove, so we should take steps to prevent plastic from entering the environment in the first place, said Bartolotta.

Cuyahoga County’s plastic bag ban, which prohibits retailers from providing most plastic bags, is in effect now, although it won’t be enforced until the summer. A six-month phase-in period was included in the law to give retailers time to use stocks of bags they already had and educate consumers. While paper bags and reusable bags each have their own environmental impacts, they do not contribute to plastic pollution, said Bartolotta.

But bags are just one source of plastic in the environment, and despite growing awareness of the harm plastic is causing, the use of plastic continues to grow.  Since 2010 worldwide annual production of plastic has grown from 270 million metric tons to 359 million metric tons. Global plastic production is expected to reach 1 billion metric tons by 2040.

In 2015, researchers found that since 1950 humans had generated 8.3 billion metric tons of plastics.  6.3 billion tons of that total had already become waste. Of that waste total, only 9 percent was recycled.

Today, the percentage of plastic being recycled is almost certainly lower.

“Recycling has collapsed,” said Bartolotta. The loss of Asian markets for recycled plastic, contamination of plastic collected for recycling, and the expense of sorting the material has made recycling uneconomic. “It is cheaper to make new plastic than it is to recycle old plastic,” said Bartolota.

So, what can we do about plastic pollution? “The solution is super simple,” said Bartolotta. “Refuse and reuse. Say ‘no’ to single-use plastic, reuse what you already have, and buy less stuff.”

But moving away from our ‘throw-away’ culture won’t be easy. Even a step as simple and obvious as replacing single-use plastic bags faces strong opposition from plastic industry groups and some retailers. Many business leaders believe consumers won’t accept more expensive or less convenient substitutes for single-use plastic products, even if the substitution reduces plastic pollution.

Bartolotta disagrees.

Research and the results of a pilot project with a group of Ohio restaurants which reduced their use of plastic straws, boxes, and bags has convinced Bartolotta that consumers don’t oppose the changes.

In fact, customers’ responsive were “overwhelmingly positive,” she said. “Restaurants did not lose business, and wait staffs did not lose tips.”

Consumers who are concerned about plastic pollution can push for change by asking businesses why they are still using plastic, said Bartolotta. “If more and more consumers have these conversations with business, business will respond,” she said. “Plastic is in the environment because of us. All these problems are completely preventable.”

January 31, 2020

photo credits: 

seagull image: Cuyahoga County http://sustainability.cuyahogacounty.us/img_sustainability/en-US/BYOBags/BagAroundGull.jpg

beach image: https://pixfeeds.com/images/topic/2918/1200-2918-environmental-pollution-photo1.jpg

Here Comes the Sun

There’s never been a better time for Cuyahoga County homeowners to invest in rooftop solar arrays. That was the message delivered by Solar United Neighbors Ohio Program Director Tristan Rader at an information session held at the Bay Village Public Library Thursday evening.

The combination of falling prices for solar arrays, federal tax incentives, low interest loan programs, and lower electrical bills can cut the cost of a residential system by thousands of dollars, said Rader. In addition, homeowners now have an opportunity to join a County-sponsored solar co-op which can lower the costs of a solar array even further.

Solar United is a non-profit organization that is partnering with Cuyahoga County to create a cooperative group of potential solar customers to reduce the cost of installing solar arrays. “We leverage the power of multiple residents in the cooperative,” said Rader. “By providing a larger customer base, we can achieve lower prices.”

The co-op solicits bids from vendors and all members receive the benefit of the reduced rates. Generally, costs for each co-op member are between 10 percent and 20 percent less than if they contracted with the solar providers individually, said Rader.

Solar United has assisted more than 200 co-ops in twelve states, with more than 100,000 members total, and has supported the installation of more than 4,600 solar arrays. This is their second Cuyahoga County co-op, and the third that the county has organized.

“Our mission is to provide education and information,” said Rader. “We support homeowners throughout the process.”

Installing solar panels can save homeowners significant money on their electric bills over the estimated 25-year life of their system. Cuyahoga County residents who participated in the county’s previous co-op programs will likely save $25,000 over 25 years, according to Cuyahoga County Director of Sustainability, Mike Foley, in a press release.

A residential system will usually cost between $10,000 and $20,000, depending on the amount of power the array can provide. A typical residential solar array can cover anywhere from 20 percent to 80 percent of a home’s electrical needs, said Rader.

If a homeowner’s system generates more power than the home requires, the excess power will be added to the power grid and the homeowner will receive a credit from the electric company that can offset the cost of power that is purchased later.

There is no cost to join the co-op and no obligation to purchase an array, said Rader. Once the co-op selects a vendor, that supplier will visit each co-op member’s home to determine what size system makes the most sense, how and where it should be installed, and how much the installation will cost. The member can then decide if he or she wants to move ahead with the project.

During the visit the vendor can answer any questions about the technology and the installation process, while Solar United representatives can provide information about available low-interest loan programs or other financing options.

The cost of generating electricity using solar panels has declined every year since 2009, and is expected to continue declining, according to the United States Department of Energy. Installation and permitting costs are also dropping. In some parts of the U.S. solar power is already cost-competitive with power supplied by the local electric utility.

In addition to economic advantages, solar power generation produces no greenhouse gases, helps reduce America’s dependence on imported fuels, contributes to a more diversified and robust energy system, and supports hundreds of thousands of American jobs.

Homeowners and business owners in Cuyahoga County can join the county’s current solar co-op until February 2020.

For more information or to join the co-op, go to www.SolarUnitedNeighbors.org/Cuyahoga.

(Photo: Courtesy of Ohio Sun)

October 24, 2019

“I shall crush them”

The war was going badly for the North Koreans, and it was about to get worse.

It was September 14, 1950, more than 11 weeks after North Korea’s June 25 invasion of South Korea. The North’s military planners had expected that it would take just four weeks to crush the Republic of Korea (ROK) army and reunify the peninsula under the communist government of Kim Il-Sung. But now it was mid-September and South Korean forces and their American allies still held a toehold around the port of Pusan. A last-gasp North Korean offensive had failed to break the ROK/U.S. lines.

North Korea was not prepared to fight a long campaign, especially against an enemy that had complete control of the air and sea.

At first, the invasion had gone exactly as planned. North Korea’s army was better equipped, better trained, and more experienced than South Korea’s forces, and the communists had quickly smashed through the southern defenses and driven the disorganized and demoralized survivors 150 miles south toward the tip of the peninsula where they would surely be trapped and annihilated.

But North Korea’s timetable had been upended catastrophically when the United States intervened with air, sea, and ground forces.  Neither the North Koreans, nor the Soviets and the Chinese, who had both reluctantly agreed to support the invasion, believed that the United States would respond to the North Korean attack with military forces of its own.

A Shocking Decision

But within 72 hours of the invasion, President Truman, erroneously believing that the Soviet Union had ordered the invasion and fearing that it might be the opening move in a world-wide communist offensive, had ordered U.S. air and naval forces to intervene. Three days later he ordered American ground forces into action, shocking the North Koreans and their patrons. On July 3, 1950 American carrier-based planes launched their first strikes against North Korean targets and within weeks were attacking North Korean troops pushing south. U.S. ground forces – although shamefully ineffective at first – arrived in increasing numbers and showed increasing competence. Supplies and reinforcements flowed through Pusan and the U.S. and ROK forces gained strength, finally halting the North Korean advance near Pusan. The objective of the North Korean invasion plan was to smash the ROK forces and occupy the entire country before the United States could rearm or resupply their ally.  But they hadn’t expected the U. S. to join the fighting.

One Last Push

On September 1, weeks after the war was supposed to be over, North Korea had launched its last big push against the U.S. and ROK lines surrounding Pusan. For their Naktong offensive, the North Koreans threw everything they had left at the U.S. and ROK defenders. It wasn’t enough.

Two months of steadily increasing U.S. air attacks against North Korean supply lines and stiffening resistance by American and South Korean ground forces had bled the North Korean army dry. To launch their attack, they had stripped defending troops from most of the key places they had captured, including the port of Inchon, and thrown thousands of untrained conscripts into battle.

Though weakened by horrific casualties and shortages of food, ammunition, and fuel, the North Korean attackers pushed forward grimly. Initially they made encouraging gains, and in a few places they actually broke through. But American and South Korean forces patched the breaches and threw the North Koreans back. With U.S. and ROK forces growing stronger, and the North Koreans reeling, it looked like the next phase of the war would be a United Nations offensive that would break the siege of Pusan and force the North Koreans back up the peninsula’s harsh terrain, one bloody mile after another.

The North Koreans were exhausted, outnumbered and running out of everything, including time. They were facing complete destruction, and neither the Soviets nor the Chinese were willing to provide military forces.

Worse, they knew that the Americans and their United Nations allies were preparing for an amphibious landing and they had no way to prevent it.

The UN landing – codenamed Operation Chromite – would take place on September 15 at the port city of Inchon, halfway up the Korean peninsula on the Yellow Sea. Planned by the American General Douglas MacArthur in his role as United Nations commander, the invasion would succeed brilliantly and lead directly to the rout of the North Korean army.

Because the landing was so successful and was accomplished at such low cost to UN forces, many observers have assumed that the North Koreans were surprised. That was hardly the case.  In fact, the landing at Inchon was one of the worst-kept secrets of the Korean War.

Operation Common Knowledge

It didn’t take any actual espionage to realize what MacArthur was planning. First of all, an amphibious landing behind the North Korean lines was a glaringly obvious maneuver, especially since UN forces had complete air and naval supremacy.  MacArthur himself had conducted dozens of similar landings during World War II to bypass Japanese strongpoints on New Guinea and in the Philippines. His belief in the value of an amphibious capability was so strong that he made certain the Far East forces he commanded from Japan were trained to conduct amphibious operations.

Before the war was one week old, MacArthur had ordered his staff to begin planning an amphibious assault behind the North Korean advance at Inchon to relieve pressure on the retreating ROK/U.S. units. That landing, codenamed Operation Bluehearts, was to have taken place before the end of July.

But the North Korean advance was so rapid, the performance of the retreating ROK troops so lacking, and the combat readiness of the U.S. forces that had been hastily dispatched to Korea from occupation duty in Japan so abysmal, that by the end of July the North Koreans were threatening to push the ROK/U.S. forces right off the peninsula. MacArthur had to turn his immediate attention to holding Pusan and its priceless port, without which the war could not be won.

So Bluehearts was canceled, but would soon be resurrected as Operation Chromite, once the ROK/U.S. position at Pusan was stabilized. By the beginning of August, MacArthur began planning Chromite in earnest.

MacArthur needed troops, transport ships, landing craft, and supplies for a major landing, and there was no way to get them without the help of hundreds of military and civilian planners, logisticians, and schedulers from staffs in Tokyo, Pearl Harbor, Washington DC, and allied capitals. Hundreds of civilians in Japan and other locations were being contracted to provide supplies or services in support of the operation. The recall of Marine reservists, the stockpiling of supplies, and preparations to use Japanese-crewed landing ships for the assault ensured that even the most obtuse observer could divine what was about to happen. Operational security was so compromised that American officers in Tokyo began referring to the planned landing as “Operation Common Knowledge.”

Mao’s Warning Ignored

Alarmed by the massive build-up of troops and ships, two weeks before the Inchon landing China’s Mao Zedong warned Kim to prepare for a landing at Inchon and urged him to strengthen defenses there.  But Kim told a Chinese emissary that the North Koreans did not believe that the UN forces had the strength to mount an amphibious landing.

Whatever strength MacArthur could muster, it was clear, though unstated, that North Korea lacked the strength to defend Inchon and simultaneously break the ROK/American lines at Pusan. Documents captured at Pyongyang later in the war showed that the North Koreans knew about the landing at Inchon before the end of August, but could do little to stop it. They had already stripped their defenses there and almost everywhere else to reinforce their offensive at Pusan, and those troops weren’t coming back. Although the North Koreans had plans to mine the harbor at Inchon, they never got to it. But even unmined and nearly undefended, Inchon was going to be no easy task for the Americans.

The Worst Possible Place

While MacArthur’s decision to conduct an amphibious landing might have been more conventional wisdom than genius, his fierce conviction that Inchon was the one place where the landing must occur was, in fact, a masterstroke.  MacArthur could not have found a physically less suitable landing area for an amphibious attack if he had searched for ten years. Everyone who knew what Inchon was like was aghast. But MacArthur believed that landing at Inchon would place his forces in the best position to cut the North Korean supply lines and crush the North Korean army besieging Pusan. His eloquent and powerful defense of the plan persuaded the skeptics – which included his nominal bosses on the Joint Chiefs of Staff – and eventually the landing was approved.

Not that the skeptics were wrong. Inchon really was a terrible place for an amphibious landing. For one thing, there were no actual beaches. The landings would have to be made against stone sea walls which rose as high as eight feet above the decks of the landing craft, forcing assault troops to use ladders to get ashore.  The only possible landing zones were in the heart of the city, which meant that once ashore, MacArthur’s troops would immediately be faced with the possibility of building-to-building combat, a type of warfare that heavily favored the defenders and seemed certain to trap the Marines in a bloody urban battle of attrition.

Landing ships could only approach the sea walls at maximum high tide, which only occurred twice each month.  At all other times the approaches to the shore were blocked by miles of impassable mud flats.  Tides at Inchon ranged from an average of 23 feet to a maximum of 33 feet and the current in the channel reached eight knots.  The two landing “beaches” were located on either side of the main port, more than four miles apart, forcing the Americans to split their forces at the outset.

The city itself was located miles from the open sea and could be reached only after navigating a narrow 10-mile long channel, which could be mined and defended by shore batteries. Near the city the channel was protected by a rugged little island called Wolmi-Do that would have to be captured prior to the main landing, thus ensuring that the North Korean defenders were alerted.

As one naval officer involved in the planning famously recalled, “We drew up a list of every natural and geographic handicap—and Inchon had ’em all.”

Building the Force

But these obstacles were only part of MacArthur’s problems. First, he had to come up with a landing force and ships to bring them ashore. In the five years since the end of World War II, the United States had junked the most successful and best-equipped amphibious force in history. By the time North Korea invaded the south, the U. S. Marine Corps had shrunk from 474,000 marines in 1945 to just over 75,000 in 1950.  The Navy’s demobilization of its amphibious fleet was even more drastic, plummeting from 3,000 ships in 1945 to 148 in 1948.

MacArthur needed more than 40,000 men for his planned assault and most of the readily available combat troops had already been sent to bolster the forces fighting at Pusan. To find two more divisions of troops, the Joint Chiefs would have to dip into America’s strategic reserve, reducing the nation’s ability to fend off another attack elsewhere.

But the chiefs and the president agreed, and by recalling thousands of Marine reservists, rebuilding the Army’s half-strength Seventh Division by stripping units from other commands, increasing America’s military personnel limits, and augmenting the Seventh Division with 8,000 untrained South Korean conscripts, the Joint Chiefs found the troops MacArthur needed.

The Navy didn’t have enough active landing ships in the Pacific to bring the two divisions ashore, so MacArthur assigned fifteen LSTs and two cargo ships that had been turned over to the Army in 1945 to support the occupation forces. These ships had been decommissioned from the Navy and were operated by Japanese crews, much of the specialized equipment needed for a landing had been removed and they were in deplorable condition, but they would have to do. The Navy quickly recommissioned the ships, made some hasty repairs, assigned new commanding officers – although most were frighteningly inexperienced – and added a few signalmen and quartermasters to the Japanese crews to assist with communications and beaching operations.  Smaller landing craft were brought out of storage and reactivated and experienced sailors were flown out from the United States to operate them.

In the end, MacArthur’s Inchon assault force included the First Marine Division, the Seventh Infantry Division, several units of ROK troops, and Corps-level support units, including artillery; supported by a multi-national naval force of 261 ships including amphibious ships, aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers, fire support ships, and minesweepers.

There would, of course, be no time for a rehearsal, and many of the troops were scarcely trained, but though hastily planned, the landing was superbly executed. Less than 90 days from North Korea’s surprise invasion, MacArthur, the U. S. and ROK militaries, and a handful of allies had turned back the North Korean attackers at Pusan and delivered a powerful counterstroke at Inchon.

Another Chinese Warning

As MacArthur had predicted, the landing faced little opposition and U. S. casualties were light.  Despite receiving explicit warnings from the Chinese that a landing at Inchon was possible, the North Koreans had gambled that they could crush the UN forces at Pusan before the Americans could land at Inchon and failed to establish an adequate defense.  Within ten days of the landings the Marines recaptured Seoul.

At Pusan, the strengthening UN forces launched an offensive on 16 September and within days were driving the North Koreans northward.  Trapped between the two UN forces, the already-weakened North Korean army collapsed with astonishing speed.   Fewer than 40,000 stragglers made their way, without equipment, back to North Korea.

The suddenness of the North Korean collapse made the reunification of North and South Korea under the South Korean government look temptingly easy, and despite receiving their own explicit warnings from the Chinese, the Joint Chiefs and President Truman gave MacArthur permission to invade the North.

But the Chinese weren’t bluffing. They would not accept a reunified Korea that was allied with the United States. As MacArthur’s forces charged north, Chinese troops flowed south. By late October, some ROK patrols had reached within a few miles of the Yalu River, the boundary between North Korea and China. On November 25 the Chinese attacked with overwhelming force, driving the U.S. and ROK forces south, over the South Korean border and beyond. Seoul, or what was left of it after being captured and liberated during the summer, was captured again.

Finally, the UN forces stiffened, and slowly pushed the North Koreans back. Once the UN forces had forced the Chinese back into North Korea, the exhausted armies of both sides settled in for a bloody two-year stalemate that was finally ended by an armistice in 1953.

“We shall land at Inchon and I shall crush them.”

– GEN Douglas MacArthur, 23 August 1950

October 11, 2019

They Don’t Know You

After many years of stagnation and decline, the Cleveland Metropolitan School District is again moving forward.

That was the upbeat message delivered last week by Cleveland Metropolitan School District CEO Eric Gordon at his 2019 State of the School address at the Renaissance Cleveland Hotel.

The district is now one of the fastest improving school districts in Ohio on K-3 literacy, performance index (standard test scores), and graduation rates, Gordon said. “We are moving upward. We know we have a long way to go. We have not yet arrived, but we are certainly on our way.”

The district’s progress is the result of The Cleveland Plan, a comprehensive school improvement program that the district and the city initiated in 2011, said Gordon. Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson, the Cleveland Board of Education, and the numerous community partners that have stepped up to support the district have played key roles. But equally important have been the efforts of Cleveland students who each day demonstrate an unflagging enthusiasm for learning and the district’s dedicated and tireless educators and staff.

“And we all owe a debt of gratitude to the people of the Cleveland School District, whose support of Issue 107, Issue 4 and Issue 108 enabled us to not only implement and sustain reforms outlined in The Cleveland Plan, but also to modernize and revitalize schools across the city,” said Gordon.

While the district ranking remains perilously low – 601st of 608 Ohio districts on Ohio’s latest performance index ranking – students across the district are succeeding every day on complex academic tasks not easily measured by test scores, said Gordon. He cited more than a half dozen examples, including a student-created app that improved the Bar Association’s website, a student-run café, a student project that created a working prosthetic hand for a classmate, a student project that developed synthetic gasoline that powered their teacher’s automobile, and a student project to repair a Cleveland Police car that had been nearly destroyed by celebrants after the Cavalier’s 2016 championship.

In 2011 the district was ranked dead last among all Ohio school districts and was “financially bankrupt and had lost all public trust,” said Gordon. Today, the district is one of the 25 fastest improving districts in Ohio, he noted. In the latest state rankings, the district earned a D, one step up from the F’s that the district had received in previous years.

“I want to make clear that we are not celebrating that we earned a D,” said Gordon. “What moving from F to D tells us is that we continue to move upward and there is a lot more yet to achieve.”

But huge challenges remain. It is no coincidence that the district’s performance ranking – based on student scores on standardized tests – is nearly identical to the district’s rank when districts are listed by household median income. Cleveland’s median household income ranks 604th, while the district’s performance index rank is 601.

The link between poverty and school performance is well-understood.  Intractable poverty affects students’ readiness to learn in countless ways.

Even as the district gains positive momentum, said Gordon, “it is important to recognize that we cannot rest.  We must maintain and build on our momentum. But at the same time, pay attention to every force that threatens to slow or even stop our progress.”

One of those forces is public perception. Near the end of his presentation, Gordon was asked by a Cleveland student, “If you could change one thing, what would it be?” Without hesitation Gordon replied, “Get rid of the Cleveland Schools stink.”

Despite the massive investment city residents have made in the district, despite the hard work of educators and staff, despite the many community organizations that support the district, and despite the extraordinary efforts of thousands of starkly disadvantaged students, the district’s reputation remains abysmal.

“When people think of the Cleveland Schools, they assume that nothing good is happening there,” said Gordon. “They don’t know about the amazing things that are happening in our classrooms. Because it is Cleveland, they assume that good things are not happening like they are in suburban districts.” Looking at some of the dozens of CMSD students in the audience, Gordon said, “They don’t know you.”

September 28, 2019

Photo: Cleveland Metropolitan School District

It’s Not About Sea Turtles

Plastic pollution doesn’t just threaten sea turtles and marine mammals – human health is at risk as well.

That was the message Thursday evening from a panel of environmental activists and government officials who spoke at the Rocky River Public Library.   The discussion was sponsored by the League of Women Voters and the Bay Village and Rocky River Green Teams.

Panelists were Cheryl Johncox of the Sierra Club Ohio; Cuyahoga County District 11 councilwoman Sunny Simon; Sarah Damon from Surfrider Foundation; Sarah Mathews from Rumpke Waste; and Cristie Snyder from the Cuyahoga County Solid Waste District.

Panelist discussed a number of issues related to plastic pollution, including growing health concerns, the role of fracking in plastic manufacturing, recycling, and House Bill 242. They urged attendees to become informed, take the problem seriously, take individual steps to reduce their use of plastic – especially single use plastic – and push legislators to enact policies that reduce plastic pollution.

Health impacts

Problems with plastic are magnified by a crucial characteristic: it never goes away. Except for the tiny fraction of plastic that has been incinerated, all of the plastic that has ever been produced remains in landfills or in the environment. Over time, plastic in the environment breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces, but it never breaks down chemically. These tiny particles are now found everywhere, from Antarctica, where they have been deposited by the wind, to your drinking water, to your bloodstream.

Plastic particles have even been found in human umbilical blood, said Johncox. “It is in all of our bodies right now.”

The health effects of long-term exposure to ingested plastic particles are still being studied, but Johncox said that we already know enough to be concerned about the plastic loading in the environment. “The science is not new on plastics,” she said. “It has been coming out of Europe for thirty years.”

In the United States, however, the petrochemical industry and their lobbyists have suppressed research into plastic’s effect on human health, added Johncox.

Still, it is widely known that elements of plastic act as endocrine disruptors, interfering with many of the bodies’ essential processes, said Johncox. These toxins affect human development, she added. Infants, people with chronic diseases, and the elderly are especially vulnerable.

It is worth noting, said Johncox, that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that parents not give children food or drink from plastic containers whenever possible.

We Are Using More and More

While awareness of the dangers of plastic has been growing in recent years, the plastic industry has ramped up production.  “Fifty percent of the plastic in the world today has been produced since 2013,” said Johncox.

While there are several reasons for the surge in plastic production, a key factor has been the growing use of fracking – hydraulic fracturing – as means of drilling for gas.

“A side product of the fracking process is feedstock for plastic production,” said Johncox.

Fracking yields significant amounts of ethane, which can be converted, or ‘cracked,’ to create ethylene, a key component of many types of plastic. The growing availability of inexpensive ethane has boosted plastic production and is sparking construction of new cracking facilities. Many of these facilities are planned or are under construction in Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania, states where fracking is concentrated.

Recycling

Recycling is helpful process, but it is very far from the solution to plastic pollution, said panel members.

Plastic recycling rates are low, currently less than 10 percent of the plastic used in the United States is recycled. For plastic bags, the numbers are even worse. “Only one or two percent of people recycle their bags,” said Simon.

In the past two years there has been a major change in the world markets for recycled material.  Most notably, China has stopped taking recycled material from the United States. Sarah Mathews, of Rumpke Waste, said recycling is going through an especially difficult time, as the lack of markets restricts the material that they can sell. “End users determine which products can be recycled,” said Mathews.

As a result, cities across the country – including communities in Greater Cleveland – have limited the types of plastic they can accept in their curbside recycling programs.  Generally, in Greater Cleveland, the only types of plastic that are accepted are bottles and jugs. All other plastic ends up in a landfill or out in the environment.

But Rumpke remains committed to recycling as an industry.  “We are continuing to make investments on our recycling facilities,” Mathews said.

Plastic recycling is a last resort, said Johncox. “Our first choice should be to reduce – ask yourself, ‘do I really need this?’ If you can’t reduce, then reuse it. If you can’t reduce or reuse it, recycle.”

Mathews said recycling issues include contamination and wishcycling.

Contamination is a huge problem for recycling facilities, said Mathews. Reduces the value of other material, threatens the safety of recycling works, and damages recycling equipment.

Wishcycling is the practice of tossing non-recyclables into the recycling bin because you want them to be recycled, regardless of whether they actually will be recycled. Mixing recyclables and non-recyclables in recycling bins contaminates the contents of the bin, and often leads to landfilling of otherwise recyclable material, said Snyder.

“You can’t throw everything in the recycling bin and expect someone else to straighten it out,” said Snyder. “That only causes more problems.”

And even when plastic is recycled, it is not truly recycled the way aluminum, steel, or glass can be.  Plastic from bottles and jugs that is collected for recycling is not used to make new bottles or jugs. Instead, it used to create other plastic products, like park benches or playground mats. This is known as ‘downcycling,’ and while it reduces the amount of new plastic being produced, it doesn’t really remove the plastic from the environment. Eventually those benches and mats will break down and begin to leach tiny particles into the environment. By downcycling we have just delayed the process.  Far better not to produce those plastic bottles in the first place.

Bag Ban / HB 242

The potential harm and the low rate at which bags are recycled prompted Councilwoman Simon to sponsor a county ordinance that will prohibit retailers from providing plastic bags. the ordinance passed earlier this year and will take effect on January 21, 2021.

But Ohio state legislators are currently considering a bill – HB 242 – that would prevent local communities, like Cuyahoga County, from banning or taxing single-use plastic bags or other containers. The bill could pass Ohio’s Republican-controlled House and Senate before the end of this year and if it does it would prevent Cuyahoga County’s bag ban from taking effect. Sunny Simon warned that the impact of HB242, if it passes, will be “irreversible.”

HB 242 is part of a nationwide effort by the plastic industry to pre-empt regulation of plastic bags or other products, said Sarah Damron, of the Surfrider Foundation. Fifteen states already have pre-emptive laws on the books.

Many of these laws – including Ohio’s – were prepared with the assistance of the Progressive Bag Alliance, a plastics industry lobbying group that is fighting efforts to regulate plastic across the United States, said Damron. On its website, the Alliance describes itself as “The frontline defense against plastic bag bans and taxes nationwide.”

Simon said that she knew the pre-emption effort was coming, even as she worked to pass the county ban. Even if state law prevents implementation of the county’s bag ban, she said, passing the ban was worth it. “Raising awareness and consciousness about the issue is valuable, whether we get pre-empted or not.”

The county plans to conduct a public education campaign to inform consumers of the ban and explain the importance of the action. The goal of the ban, she said, is to change consumer behavior. “As consumers, we should reject plastic bags, straws, and other single-use plastic.”

If HB 242 becomes law, said Simon, the county will challenge the law in court, arguing that the law unconstitutionally interferes with the home rule powers of local communities.

What can people do?

The panel agreed that reducing the harm from plastic in the environment will require public awareness; changes to consumer behavior; and some forms of regulation, including bans, fees, and producer responsibility laws.

But Individuals don’t need to wait for government or industry to respond. Consumer pressure is one of the key drivers leading manufacturers to reduce packaging waste, said Damron, and continued consumer pressure can accelerate change. Individuals can stimulate change by:

  • Refusing to accept single-use plastic packaging.
  • Reducing and reusing products and packaging whenever possible. 
  • Recycling properly to reduce contamination in the recycling stream.
  • Opposing HB 242 – contact your state legislators and make your views known.
  • Learn about plastics and share your information with others.

“We can all make a difference,” said Mathews.

August 30, 2019

I feel the need … for speed

The Air Show is in town this weekend, featuring hundreds of millions of dollars worth of the latest military aviation technology, flown and maintained by the best of the best. An event that is all-but-certain to make the heart of every true American swell with pride.

So, naturally, we went to the wiener dog races at the fairground.

The show ring at the livestock barn was packed to the rafters and the crowd yelled themselves horse (kind of a livestock joke there..) as the little canines zig-zagged their way to the finish line. The crowd was into it, the dogs seemed to enjoy it – they all got pets and treats at the finish line, even if it took them two minutes to cover the sixty feet – and money collected by registration fees supports a dachshund rescue organization.

Like the sign on the wall said, “There are no losers, only wieners.”

September 1, 2019

Talk to me, Goose.

Twenty Thousand Miles to Go: Saving the USS Marblehead

Three Japanese bombs saved the USS Marblehead from total destruction in February 1942.

Nearly sunk by Japanese land-based bombers at the battle of Makassar Strait on 4 February 1942, the American light cruiser Marblehead was kept afloat by heroic damage control, inspiring leadership, rigorous training, and the unrelenting courage of her crew. Though grievously damaged – a nine-foot hole in her hull, thirty-four compartments flooded, steering inoperable, electical power reduced, speed nearly halved – during the next 89 days Marblehead sailed more than 20,000 miles to the U.S. east coast for repairs that allowed her to return to the fight before the end of 1942.

Had Japanese pilots missed their target and had Marblehead remained in the combat theater, she almost certainly would have shared the fate of the American cruiser Houston, the Dutch cruisers De Ruyter and Java, the British cruiser Exeter, and the Australian cruiser Perth, all of which were sunk in the doomed allied attempt to defend the the Netherlands East Indies from Japanese invaders during the first three months of 1942.

But Marblehead survived, and her crew of more than 450 men avoided death or years of brutal captivity as prisoners of war.

USS Marblehead was an Omaha-class light cruiser, designed during the First World War and commissioned in 1923. Intended to serve as a long-range scout for the main force of battleships and heavy cruisers, Marblehead and her sisters were optimized for speed and endurance. They originally carried twelve 6-inch guns, mounted in a pair of two-gun turrets and eight casement mounts, an arrangement more appropriate to the Spanish-American War than to World War II.

By the late 1930’s the Omaha cruisers were thoroughly obsolete, though Marblehead herself could still approach her designed speed of 34 knots.

Marblehead had been assigned to the U. S. Asiatic Fleet in 1938, as China’s peasant armies struggled to stem the Japanese invasion of their country. For the next three years Marblehead and the rest of the Asiatic Fleet could only watch nervously as diplomatic relations between America and Japan deteriorated and the Imperial Japanese Navy strengthened its fleet with modern ships and aircraft, gained combat experience, and perfected the world’s most potent aircraft carrier strike force.

Throughout this period the Asiatic Fleet remained woefully weak, with just a pair of cruisers – Marblehead and Houston – twelve aging destroyers, fifteen submarines, and a motley collection of obsolete river craft, escort vessels, minesweepers, tenders, and patrol planes.

But even as war with Japan drew ever-more certain, the U. S. Navy could not spare additional vessels to shore up the Asiatic Fleet. U. S. war plans called for the Asiatic Fleet to fight a rear-guard delaying action, supporting American ground forces in the Philippines as long as possible, then retreating south to support the defense of Singapore and the Dutch East Indies. If those efforts failed, the Asiatic Fleet would retreat further to Australia.

But when war came, the power and speed of the Japanese advance shocked American and allied planners. Eight U. S. battleships were sunk or damaged at Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941, and British naval power in Asia was broken with the loss of HMS Repulse and HMS Prince of Wales to Japanese air attacks on 8 December. U. S. airpower in the Philippines was virtually destroyed the same day, and the American naval base at Cavite in Manila Bay was wrecked by Japanese air attacks on 10 December. Before the war was four days old, any hope for an effective naval defense of the Philippines was lost.

Within weeks the Asiatic Fleet became part of the hastily organized American, British, Dutch, and Australia (ABDA) command. Unsurprisingly, ABDA’s aging ships and untrained crews would prove to be no match for the disciplined, superbly trained, and well-equipped Japanese.

If ABDA had been created a year or two sooner, if its units had ever worked together and established communications and operational protocols, if the nations involved had agreed on a common strategy, and if the various senior leaders had put aside personal animosities, perhaps ABDA could have put up a stouter defense.

As it was though, the brief, inglorious history of ABDA was a sad tale of neglect, hubris, and hopeless courage in the face of overwhelming Japanese power, leaving the crews of individual ships – including Marblehead – to pay the price.

The end would come quickly for ABDA, but not without a fight. On 24 January 1942, four U. S. destroyers attacked a Japanese landing force at Balikpapan, sinking four transports and a patrol boat.

Marblehead had originally been assigned to participate in the attack, but engine problems forced her out of the line-up. She was replaced by USS Boise, a recent addition to the ABDA fleet. But on the day before the attack, Boise struck an uncharted coral head in the Sapi Strait, damaging her hull and forcing her to withdraw to Ceylon for repairs. She, too, survived the coming disaster. Marblehead was quickly assigned in her stead, but was not able to reach Balikpapan in time to join the attack.

A second attack against Japanese transport shipping planned for 31 January was cancelled when a U. S. scout plane discovered that the Japanese force at Balikpapan had been reinforced by additional cruisers and destroyers. So, the allies assembled a larger force of four cruisers – including Marblehead – and seven destroyers and headed for Makassar Strait.

They never got there.

Japanese aircraft spotted the allied ships near Cape Maduro in the Java Sea and at 9:50 am on 4 February 1942, 36 Japanese bombers attacked the ABDA ships. No allied ships were sunk, but USS Houston suffered a hit that killed 48 sailors and disabled her aft eight-inch gun turret and Marblehead was nearly destroyed.

For more than thirty minutes Marblehead dodged Japanese bombs, twisting and turning at full speed, and throwing up as much anti-aircraft fire as her furious gunners could manage. But at 10:26 am, eight single-engine Japanese bombers passed directly overhead, dropping eight bombs that straddled the ship. One bomb struck Marblehead’s stern, another struck amidships, and a third exploded close aboard forward. Large fires erupted amidships and at the stern and the ship quickly listed eight degrees to starboard. Unseen from the bridge, the near miss off the port bow had ruptured the cruiser’s hull and tons of seawater were rushing into the ship.

Below decks the cruiser was a flaming wreck. The bombs had destroyed the wardroom, which was being used as an emergency medical station, the sick bay below, and the emergency steering room, jamming the ship’s rudders at hard left. Engines racing, Marblehead could only circle to port as gunners peered skyward to spot any further attacks. The main deck was ripped open at the stern; power, water, and communications lines were cut; most berthing areas were smashed; and the after turret was inoperable.

Damage control parties rushed to extinguish fires, shore up damaged compartments, and take stock of the ship’s condition. Twelve crewmen were dead and more than 70 were wounded, some mortally. By noon – less than two hours after the bomb strikes – the fires were out and the rudder had been nearly centered at nine degrees left, although it was still immobile.

But the engines were working and if she held together and stayed afloat Marblehead could still make better than twenty knots. She could be steered on a general course by adjusting the speed of the engines, although she was continually swinging 40 to 50 degrees off course. Twenty-six compartments were flooded completely and eight others were partially flooded. Although the list had been corrected, Marblehead was down by the head by ten feet, and was continuing to flood. She was, in fact, sinking. Already the bow was barely above the sea.

With no reserve buoyancy, all that was keeping her afloat was the creaking efforts of the overworked pumps and desperate bailing by the crew. Any further battle damage would almost certainly sink the ship, and Marblehead was unlikely to survive even moderately heavy seas. In addition, many of the wounded needed treatment that the damaged ship could not provide – they would die if they could not get to a hospital soon. The nearest port with a hospital and rudimentary repair facilities was Tjilitjap, more than 400 miles away. Getting there would require taking the unsteerable, sinking ship through narrow Lombok Strait, with its rushing four-knot current and uncharted shoals. Marblehead would be escorted by two destroyers, but she would remain within range of Japanese bombers the entire way and would be crossing waters that were likely to harbor Japanese submarines.

Her first moments in the strait were hardly promising. As soon as Marblehead entered the rushing current she was pushed fifty degrees off course. Rather than try to recover, Marblehead’s commanding officer, Captain Arthur Robinson, let the ship complete a full circle before trying again. Marblehead made it into the strait on the second try, and somehow stayed off the rocks, even as rain squalls reduced visibility to zero.

They cleared the strait just after midnight and headed west for Tjilatjap. During the long night the crew struggled to keep their ravaged ship afloat. They gained an edge when they manhandled a 3.5-ton pump from the engine room to the main deck where it could match the water rushing in through the breached hull.

That afternoon another flight of Japanese bombers sighted Marblehead and her escorts. But the Japanese planes focused their attacks on the destroyer Paul Jones, possibly mistaking her for the cruiser, and no planes made runs at Marblehead. Undamaged and fully maneuverable, Paul Jones escaped unscathed. Finally, at dawn on February 6, nearly two days after the battle, Marblehead reached Tjilatjap.

But Marblehead’s troubles were far from over. Although there was a Dutch hospital that could care for the most seriously wounded, and a cemetery for the dead, the only drydock in the small port was a floating dock that was too short to accommodate the 550-foot-long cruiser. Unless they could get the ship’s damaged bow out of the water, they had no hope of patching the hole in her bottom.

So they did.

The drydock crew flooded the dock, sinking it below the keel of Marblehead. They then hauled the cruiser’s bow across the threshold, secured the ship as best they could, and pumped out the dock’s tanks, raising the dock and lifting the forward half of Marblehead. The cruiser slanted alarmingly, but the stern remained afloat and the damaged bow was clear of the water. This was no one’s idea of a proper docking and Marblehead was as likely to slide sternward off the dock or capsize the whole rig as it was to remain upright.

But there were no other options and somehow Marblehead stayed put. The docking took three tries, but the third was successful and workers were able to patch the nine-foot hole the near-miss had opened in the ship’s hull. With the massive main engines located near the stern, it was too risky even for Marblehead’s dauntless engineers to try to raise the stern, so repairs to the steering gear would have to wait.

The rudder was still inoperable and not all the leaks could be fixed, but Marblehead’s crew could continue to steer by engines and the ship’s pumps might conceivably keep the vessel afloat during the long voyage to the nearest allied shipyard. Most guns were operable, a temporary patch had been placed over the damaged deck at the stern, additional liferafts had been installed, tons of debris were removed from the ship’s interior, and a device was constructed that would measure the flexing of the damaged hull to give the crew some warning if the ship were about to break apart. It was time to go.

On 13 February 1942, after six days in Tjilatjap under constant threat of Japanese air attack, Marblehead got underway for Ceylon, nearly 4,000 miles distant. Left behind were more than 30 badly wounded sailors who remained at the Dutch hospital and fourteen Marblehead crewmen who had been buried in the European Cemetery at Tjilatjap.

The cruiser hadn’t gone a mile when fresh disaster nearly struck. Unable to steer a straight course, Marblehead was being towed through the minefield protecting Tjilatjap when the towline parted, leaving the damaged cruiser adrift in the narrow channel, surrounded by mines. As the tug backed toward the cruiser to remake the tow, she struck Marblehead’s stem hard, bending the cruiser’s bow and opening a hole near the waterline in the only forward compartment that was still watertight. Miraculously, the Dutch pilot was able to steer Marblehead out of the minefield using the engines.

One more leak wasn’t going to make much difference, so the barely seaworthy and only marginally steerable Marblehead headed for Ceylon, escorted by the submarine tender USS Otus. The tender provided little combat capability, but she wasn’t there to fight; her task was to pick up any survivors if Marblehead went down during the transit, an eventuality which seemed entirely possible, if not exactly likely.

During the voyage, Marblehead’s crew continued to make repairs. Electricians restored electrical power to more parts of the ship while engineers restored fresh water to much of the vessel. They even constructed a make-shift ice machine. These repairs helped, but the ship still needed extensive repairs and drydocking.

But upon arriving at Ceylon on 21 February, Marblehead’s crew was dismayed to learn – though they could hardly have been surprised – that the dockyard was booked for the next month and major repairs would have to wait. So they continued to work on their ship themselves, and by 2 March they managed to repair the steering motors by using parts salvaged from other equipment that had been damaged in the battle. The rudder wouldn’t have full range of motion, and it would have to be operated from the steering engine room, but it was vastly better than steering by engines.

Within an hour of the successful test of the steering gear Marblehead was underway. On 15 March they reached South Africa, where they refueled before entering the Royal Navy dockyard at Simonstown on 24 March.

On 15 April, the freshly patched, fully steerable, and agreeably habitable Marblehead left Simonstown for the final leg of her voyage home. Around the Cape of Good Hope, to Recife, Brazil, and finally, on 4 May 1942, to the Brooklyn Navy Yard in New York Harbor, where permanent repairs and modernizing updates were completed. On 14 October 1942 Marblehead rejoined the U. S. fleet. She served until the end of the war, oulasting virtually the entire Imperial Japanese Navy.

Marblehead’s journey from the Java Sea to New York took 89 days and covered more than 20,000 miles, much of it with inoperable steering, uncontrolled leaks, limited electrical power, and almost no habitable bething areas. Her arrival at New York was heralded by the Navy and the press.

But acclaim for the remarkable dedication and resourcefulness of Marblehead’s crew couldn’t overshadow the grim news from the Pacific theater. While Marblehead was limping halfway around the world, Singapore, Java, and Bataan fell to the Japanese. Corregidor surrendered on 6 May, two days after Marblehead reached New York. More than one hundred thousand American, Filipino, British, Indian, Dutch, and Australian military personnel were thrown into barbaric captivity. Before the end of the war, tens of thousands had died from malnutrition, disease, overwork or had been executed.

The ABDA Afloat command was dis-established in early March, having lost five cruisers, twelve destroyers, and more than 4,500 men, including more than 1,800 Americans. USS Houston was gone – sunk with HMAS Perth at Sunda Strait on 1 March 1942 – and the remnants of the U.S. Asiatic Fleet fled to Australia. Dutch naval power in the Pacific was broken beyond repair and the Royal Navy retreated to the Indian Ocean. British warships wouldn’t return to the Pacific until 1944.

The crew of Marblehead and the other ships of the ABDA naval component fought on long after it was obvious that their force was too weak to stop the Japanese advance. Written off by their own nations, they demonstrated extraordinary courage and an unimaginable devotion to duty that continues to resonate today.

A version of this post was originally published on the Military History Now website.

https://militaryhistorynow.com/?s=uss+marblehead

Are You Still Here?

I keep seeing posts and memes in support of term limits for members of Congress. It appears that term limits for Congress is a popular idea.  This is somewhat confusing, as I always thought that terms were already limited. I am sure I read somewhere that representatives serve two-year terms and senators serve for six years.

If a member of Congress serves longer than a single term, isn’t it because the voters he or she represents want them to continue in office? Incumbent officeholders still have to run in elections to remain in office, right? If voters are dissatisfied with their performance, can’t they elect someone else?

So, by imposing term limits, are we saying that voters aren’t competent to select their own representatives?  If so, why hold elections at all? 

Or are we saying that experience in Congress is automatically undesireable?  Do we prefer other professionals to be inexperienced? Emergency Medical Technicians? Nuclear power plant operators? Auto mechanics? (“Wow, that’s a complicated piece of engineering there, Mr. Jones. I’ve never actually seen an engine like this. I did read a little about them when I was in school last year, so let’s take a look. Please hand me that hammer and step back…”)

Is there data that shows that inexperienced legislators are more effective?  Actually, there is data, based on the experiences of state legislatures which have already implemented term limits, and it does not support the idea that term limits reduce corruption or otherwise improve the performance of legislators. In fact, there is evidence that less experienced legislators are more dependent on lobbyists and other interest groups.

There are plenty of problems with Congress, starting with the fact the fact that there are no real incentives for bipartisan cooperation. Changing out the people working in a wildly dysfunctional system is the political equivalent of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic as the ship fills with water.

Term limits probably won’t hurt much, except in cases where effective and popular legislators are prevented from running for re-election and are replaced by inexperienced legislators who rely on special interest groups to help them ‘understand’ complex policy issues. But as a means of improving Congressional performance, they are a simplistic and ineffective answer to a complex problem, and any energy spent on advocating term limits is effort that could be better used elsewhere. 

February 28, 2019

See also:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/05/08/no-term-limits-wont-draintheswamp-we-did-the-research/?utm_term=.dfe27b1e9f34

https://www.thoughtco.com/debate-over-term-limits-for-congress-3367505

Photo credit: visitthecapitol.gov

Warning Lights Would Be Flashing

American politics over the next 18 months will help decide the fate of earth’s environment, said a panel of environmental experts today at Cleveland’s Huntington Convention Center.

Christine Whitman, former Republican governor of New Jersey and former Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Dr. David Orr, Professor of Environmental Studies and Politics at Oberlin College; and Shanelle Smith, Ohio State Director for the Trust for Public Land were the panelists at the City Club’s 2019 State of the Great Lakes presentation on Friday, June 21.

“The state of our democracy and the state of the earth are linked,” said Orr. We are not going to be able to solve our environmental problems unless we address our political problems.

The more northern we look, the more Earth is warming, as shown by this NASA image.
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-temps.html

America has made great progress in cleaning and protecting the environment in the past fifty years, said the panel. 1969 was a tipping point for America’s environment.

Awareness of the costs of unconstrained industrial pollution had been building since the 1962 publication of Rachel Carson’s book, Silent Spring. But a major oil spill in Santa Barbara, California in January 1969, and a fire on the Cuyahoga River in June of that year boosted public awareness and sparked a flurry of federal environmental legislation.

Within six months Congress passed the National Environmental Protection Act and before the end of 1974 Congress had created the Environmental Protection Agency, strengthened the Clean Air Act, and passed the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Over the next decades dramatic progress was made in cleaning the nation’s air and water.

But that progress is now imperiled.

“We’ve made a lot of progress,” said former EPA Administrator Whitman. “But now we are starting to backslide.” The Trump administration’s large-scale rollback of environmental regulations is concerning. Whitman said she understood the need to review regulations to ensure their continued usefulness. “But to just do away with them because you don’t like them makes no sense.”

The early environmental acts were passed with the support of Democrats and Republicans and were signed by a Republican president, said Orr. “The environment wasn’t a partisan issue, it was a convergence issue, something that needed to be done.”

But now environmental regulations have become a partisan issue, he said. “Politically, we have to come together. This is the challenge of our time.”

Wittman said that the American public sees the importance of the issue, but the actions of the Trump administration are troubling. She called the refusal of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to sign a final declaration at the Arctic Conference unless all references to climate change were removed “mind-boggling.” The Arctic, Wittman noted, is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet.

“Without leadership from the top,” she said, “you are not going to get the necessary focus.”

Today, said Wittman, environmental issues like everything else, are viewed through a partisan political prism, not through a policy prism.

But while partisan differences are acute in Washington DC, said Orr, the American public is less divided on environmental issues than some people say. Polling data indicates that “Americans of both parties consistently support robust environmental policies. But the link between what we want as people, and what we get as policy is broken,” he said.

Whitman and Orr both believe that the 2020 election will be critical for the nation’s environment.

“This is the first election in my life when the environment will be a major issue,” said Whitman. “That is good.” She expects that the Green New Deal, proposed by Congressional Democrats, will spark significant debate.

“If we get an in-depth, intelligent discussion of what we need to do concerning the environment we will be where we need to be,” she said.

Orr said the upcoming election will determine if America’s politics are resilient enough to handle the crisis we are facing.

But citizens will need to force elected officials to address environmental issues, said the panelists. “Elected leaders won’t respond until the public demands it,” said Whitman, the former governor.

“Citizens need to make their voices heard,” said Smith.

So far, the public has not forced attention to the issues. “It is very difficult to get people to consider the cumulative impact of their individual behaviors,” said Whitman. “We need to get people together to agree that there is a problem, then we can start working together to solve it,”

Orr agreed that individual behavior is important. But the scale of the problem requires government action, as well. “The drivers of individual consumer behavior are conscience and public policy,” he said.

Many Americans do not appreciate the impact of the latest climate data, said Orr. “Citizens need to know their numbers.”

The latest data is alarming, said Orr. “If we were in an aircraft cockpit there would be warning lights flashing all over the place. But we don’t have a political warning system. We have a limited time to get a handle on this.”

We won’t be able to solve our environmental problems until we solve our political problems, said Orr. “This isn’t about making democracy great again. It’s about taking democracy to the next level, creating a democracy that works for everyone, democracy that is transparent, fair, decent, foresighted, and scientifically literate.”

“This process starts at the neighborhood level,” he concluded, “with us talking to each other.”

Global temperature anomalies averaged from 2008 through 2012